build-macos-apps
Build professional native macOS apps in Swift with SwiftUI and AppKit. Full lifecycle - build, debug, test, optimize, ship. CLI-only, no Xcode.
Build professional native macOS apps in Swift with SwiftUI and AppKit. Full lifecycle - build, debug, test, optimize, ship. CLI-only, no Xcode.
<essential_principles>
How We Work
The user is the product owner. Claude is the developer.
The user does not write code. The user does not read code. The user describes what they want and judges whether the result is acceptable. Claude implements, verifies, and reports outcomes.
1. Prove, Don't Promise
Never say "this should work." Prove it:
xcodebuild build 2>&1 | xcsift # Build passes
xcodebuild test # Tests pass
open .../App.app # App launches
If you didn't run it, you don't know it works.
2. Tests for Correctness, Eyes for Quality
| Question | How to Answer |
|---|---|
| Does the logic work? | Write test, see it pass |
| Does it look right? | Launch app, user looks at it |
| Does it feel right? | User uses it |
| Does it crash? | Test + launch |
| Is it fast enough? | Profiler |
Tests verify correctness. The user verifies desirability.
3. Report Outcomes, Not Code
Bad: "I refactored DataService to use async/await with weak self capture"
Good: "Fixed the memory leak. leaks now shows 0 leaks. App tested stable for 5 minutes."
The user doesn't care what you changed. The user cares what's different.
4. Small Steps, Always Verified
Change → Verify → Report → Next change
Never batch up work. Never say "I made several changes." Each change is verified before the next. If something breaks, you know exactly what caused it.
5. Ask Before, Not After
Unclear requirement? Ask now.
Multiple valid approaches? Ask which.
Scope creep? Ask if wanted.
Big refactor needed? Ask permission.
Wrong: Build for 30 minutes, then "is this what you wanted?"
Right: "Before I start, does X mean Y or Z?"
6. Always Leave It Working
Every stopping point = working state. Tests pass, app launches, changes committed. The user can walk away anytime and come back to something that works.
</essential_principles>
What would you like to do?
- Build a new app
- Debug an existing app
- Add a feature
- Write/run tests
- Optimize performance
- Ship/release
- Something else
Then read the matching workflow from workflows/ and follow it.
<verification_loop>
After Every Change
# 1. Does it build?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName build 2>&1 | xcsift
# 2. Do tests pass?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName test
# 3. Does it launch? (if UI changed)
open ./build/Build/Products/Debug/AppName.app
Report to the user:
- "Build: ✓"
- "Tests: 12 pass, 0 fail"
- "App launches, ready for you to check [specific thing]"
</verification_loop>
<when_to_test>
Testing Decision
Write a test when:
- Logic that must be correct (calculations, transformations, rules)
- State changes (add, delete, update operations)
- Edge cases that could break (nil, empty, boundaries)
- Bug fix (test reproduces bug, then proves it's fixed)
- Refactoring (tests prove behavior unchanged)
Skip tests when:
- Pure UI exploration ("make it blue and see if I like it")
- Rapid prototyping ("just get something on screen")
- Subjective quality ("does this feel right?")
- One-off verification (launch and check manually)
The principle: Tests let the user verify correctness without reading code. If the user needs to verify it works, and it's not purely visual, write a test.
</when_to_test>
<reference_index>
Domain Knowledge
All in references/:
Architecture: app-architecture, swiftui-patterns, appkit-integration, concurrency-patterns
Data: data-persistence, networking
App Types: document-apps, shoebox-apps, menu-bar-apps
System: system-apis, app-extensions
Development: project-scaffolding, cli-workflow, cli-observability, testing-tdd, testing-debugging
Polish: design-system, macos-polish, security-code-signing
</reference_index>
<workflows_index>
Workflows
All in workflows/:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| build-new-app.md | Create new app from scratch |
| debug-app.md | Find and fix bugs |
| add-feature.md | Add to existing app |
| write-tests.md | Write and run tests |
| optimize-performance.md | Profile and speed up |
| ship-app.md | Sign, notarize, distribute |
| </workflows_index> |
You Might Also Like
Related Skills
cache-components
Expert guidance for Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR). **PROACTIVE ACTIVATION**: Use this skill automatically when working in Next.js projects that have `cacheComponents: true` in their next.config.ts/next.config.js. When this config is detected, proactively apply Cache Components patterns and best practices to all React Server Component implementations. **DETECTION**: At the start of a session in a Next.js project, check for `cacheComponents: true` in next.config. If enabled, this skill's patterns should guide all component authoring, data fetching, and caching decisions. **USE CASES**: Implementing 'use cache' directive, configuring cache lifetimes with cacheLife(), tagging cached data with cacheTag(), invalidating caches with updateTag()/revalidateTag(), optimizing static vs dynamic content boundaries, debugging cache issues, and reviewing Cache Component implementations.
vercel
component-refactoring
Refactor high-complexity React components in Dify frontend. Use when `pnpm analyze-component --json` shows complexity > 50 or lineCount > 300, when the user asks for code splitting, hook extraction, or complexity reduction, or when `pnpm analyze-component` warns to refactor before testing; avoid for simple/well-structured components, third-party wrappers, or when the user explicitly wants testing without refactoring.
langgenius
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
anthropicsfrontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
anthropics
react-modernization
Upgrade React applications to latest versions, migrate from class components to hooks, and adopt concurrent features. Use when modernizing React codebases, migrating to React Hooks, or upgrading to latest React versions.
wshobsontailwind-design-system
Build scalable design systems with Tailwind CSS v4, design tokens, component libraries, and responsive patterns. Use when creating component libraries, implementing design systems, or standardizing UI patterns.
wshobson