Sentry Code Review

Review and fix issues identified by Sentry bot in GitHub PR comments.

Invoke This Skill When

• User asks to "review Sentry comments" or "fix Sentry issues" on a PR
• User shares a PR URL/number and mentions Sentry feedback
• User asks to "address Sentry review" or "resolve Sentry findings"
• User wants to find PRs with unresolved Sentry comments

Workflow

Phase 1: Fetch Sentry Comments

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments \
  --jq '.[] | select(.user.login | startswith("sentry")) | {file: .path, line: .line, body: .body}'

Only process comments from sentry[bot] - ignore other bots.

Phase 2: Parse Each Comment

Extract from the markdown body:

• Bug description: Line starting with **Bug:**
• Severity/Confidence: In <sub>Severity: X | Confidence: X.XX</sub>
• Analysis: Inside <summary>🔍 <b>Detailed Analysis</b></summary> block
• Suggested Fix: Inside <summary>💡 <b>Suggested Fix</b></summary> block
• AI Prompt: Inside <summary>🤖 <b>Prompt for AI Agent</b></summary> block

Phase 3: Verify & Fix

For each issue:

1. Read the file at the specified line
2. Confirm issue still exists in current code
3. Review related code to understand if its an actual issue or not
4. Implement fix (suggested or your own)
5. Consider edge cases

Phase 4: Summarize and Report Results

## Sentry Review: PR #[number]

### Resolved
| File:Line | Issue | Severity | Fix Applied |
|-----------|-------|----------|-------------|
| path:123  | desc  | HIGH     | what done   |

### Manual Review Required
| File:Line | Issue | Reason |
|-----------|-------|--------|

**Summary:** X resolved, Y need manual review

Common Issue Types

Category	Examples
Type Safety	Missing null checks, unsafe type assertions
Error Handling	Swallowed errors, missing boundaries
Validation	Permissive inputs, missing sanitization
Config	Missing env vars, incorrect paths