
doc-sync
ПопулярноSynchronizes docs across a repository. Use when user asks to sync docs.
Synchronizes docs across a repository. Use when user asks to sync docs.
Doc Sync
Maintains the CLAUDE.md navigation hierarchy and README.md invisible knowledge
docs across a repository. This skill is self-contained and performs all
documentation work directly.
Documentation Conventions
For authoritative CLAUDE.md and README.md format specification:
The conventions/ directory contains all universal documentation standards.
Scope Resolution
Determine scope FIRST:
| User Request | Scope |
|---|---|
| "sync docs" / "update documentation" / no specific path | REPOSITORY-WIDE |
| "sync docs in src/validator/" | DIRECTORY: src/validator/ and descendants |
| "update CLAUDE.md for parser.py" | FILE: single file's parent directory |
For REPOSITORY-WIDE scope, perform a full audit. For narrower scopes, operate only within the specified boundary.
Workflow
Phase 1: Discovery
Map directories requiring CLAUDE.md verification:
# Find all directories (excluding .git, node_modules, __pycache__, etc.)
find . -type d \( -name .git -o -name node_modules -o -name __pycache__ -o -name .venv -o -name target -o -name dist -o -name build \) -prune -o -type d -print
For each directory in scope, record:
- Does CLAUDE.md exist?
- If yes, does it have the required table-based index structure?
- What files/subdirectories exist that need indexing?
Phase 2: Audit
For each directory, check for drift and misplaced content:
<audit_check dir="[path]">
CLAUDE.md exists: [YES/NO]
Has table-based index: [YES/NO]
Files in directory: [list]
Files in index: [list]
Missing from index: [list]
Stale in index (file deleted): [list]
Triggers are task-oriented: [YES/NO/PARTIAL]
Contains misplaced content: [YES/NO] (architecture/design docs that belong in README.md)
README.md exists: [YES/NO]
README.md warranted: [YES/NO] (invisible knowledge present?)
</audit_check>
Phase 3: Content Migration
Critical: If CLAUDE.md contains content that does NOT belong there, migrate it:
Content that MUST be moved from CLAUDE.md to README.md:
- Architecture explanations or diagrams
- Design decision documentation
- Component interaction descriptions
- Overview sections with prose (beyond one sentence)
- Invariants or rules documentation
- Any "why" explanations beyond simple triggers
- Key Invariants sections
- Dependencies sections (explanatory -- index can note dependencies exist)
- Constraints sections
- Purpose sections with prose (beyond one sentence)
- Any bullet-point lists explaining rationale
Content that MAY stay in CLAUDE.md (operational sections):
- Build commands specific to this directory
- Test commands specific to this directory
- Regeneration/sync commands (e.g., protobuf regeneration)
- Deploy commands
- Other copy-pasteable procedural commands
Test: Ask "is this explaining WHY or telling HOW?" Explanatory content
(architecture, decisions, rationale) goes to README.md. Operational content
(commands, procedures) stays in CLAUDE.md.
Migration process:
- Identify misplaced content in CLAUDE.md
- Create or update README.md with the architectural content
- Strip CLAUDE.md down to pure index format
- Add README.md to the CLAUDE.md index table
Phase 4: Index Updates
For each directory needing work:
Creating/Updating CLAUDE.md:
- Use the appropriate template (ROOT or SUBDIRECTORY)
- Populate tables with all files and subdirectories
- Write "What" column: factual content description
- Write "When to read" column: action-oriented triggers
- If README.md exists, include it in the Files table
Creating README.md (when invisible knowledge exists):
- Verify invisible knowledge exists (semantic trigger, not structural)
- Document architecture, design decisions, invariants, tradeoffs
- Apply the content test: remove anything visible from code
- Keep as concise as possible while capturing all invisible knowledge
- Must be self-contained: do not reference external authoritative sources
Phase 5: Verification
After all updates complete, verify:
- Every directory in scope has CLAUDE.md
- All CLAUDE.md files use table-based index format (pure navigation)
- No drift remains (files <-> index entries match)
- No misplaced content in CLAUDE.md (explanatory prose moved to README.md)
- README.md files are indexed in their parent CLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.md contains only: one-sentence overview + tabular index + operational sections
- README.md exists wherever invisible knowledge was identified
- README.md files are self-contained (no external authoritative references)
Output Format
## Doc Sync Report
### Scope: [REPOSITORY-WIDE | directory path]
### Changes Made
- CREATED: [list of new CLAUDE.md files]
- UPDATED: [list of modified CLAUDE.md files]
- MIGRATED: [list of content moved from CLAUDE.md to README.md]
- CREATED: [list of new README.md files]
- FLAGGED: [any issues requiring human decision]
### Verification
- Directories audited: [count]
- CLAUDE.md coverage: [count]/[total] (100%)
- CLAUDE.md format: [count] pure index / [count] needed migration
- Drift detected: [count] entries fixed
- Content migrations: [count] (prose moved to README.md)
- README.md files: [count] (wherever invisible knowledge exists)
- Self-contained: [YES/NO] (no external authoritative references)
Exclusions
DO NOT create CLAUDE.md for:
- Generated files directories (dist/, build/, compiled outputs)
- Vendored dependencies (node_modules/, vendor/, third_party/)
- Git internals (.git/)
- IDE/editor configs (.idea/, .vscode/ unless project-specific settings)
- Stub directories (contain only
.gitkeepor no code files) - these do not
require CLAUDE.md until code is added
DO NOT index (skip these files in CLAUDE.md):
- Generated files (.generated., compiled outputs)
- Vendored dependency files
DO index:
- Hidden config files that affect development (.eslintrc, .env.example, .gitignore)
- Test files and test directories
- Documentation files (including README.md)
Anti-Patterns
Index Anti-Patterns
Too vague (matches everything):
| `config/` | Configuration | Working with configuration |
Content description instead of trigger:
| `cache.rs` | Contains the LRU cache implementation | - |
Missing action verb:
| `parser.py` | Input parsing | Input parsing and format handling |
Correct Examples
| `cache.rs` | LRU cache with O(1) get/set | Implementing caching, debugging misses, tuning eviction |
| `config/` | YAML config parsing, env overrides | Adding config options, changing defaults, debugging config loading |
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Single file documentation (inline comments, docstrings) - handle directly
- Code comments - handle directly
- Function/module docstrings - handle directly
- This skill is for CLAUDE.md/README.md synchronization specifically
Reference
For additional trigger pattern examples, see references/trigger-patterns.md.
You Might Also Like
Related Skills

update-docs
This skill should be used when the user asks to "update documentation for my changes", "check docs for this PR", "what docs need updating", "sync docs with code", "scaffold docs for this feature", "document this feature", "review docs completeness", "add docs for this change", "what documentation is affected", "docs impact", or mentions "docs/", "docs/01-app", "docs/02-pages", "MDX", "documentation update", "API reference", ".mdx files". Provides guided workflow for updating Next.js documentation based on code changes.
vercel
docstring
Write docstrings for PyTorch functions and methods following PyTorch conventions. Use when writing or updating docstrings in PyTorch code.
pytorch
docs-writer
Always use this skill when the task involves writing, reviewing, or editing files in the `/docs` directory or any `.md` files in the repository.
google-gemini
write-concept
Write or review JavaScript concept documentation pages for the 33 JavaScript Concepts project, following strict structure and quality guidelines
leonardomso
resource-curator
Find, evaluate, and maintain high-quality external resources for JavaScript concept documentation, including auditing for broken and outdated links
leonardomso
doc-coauthoring
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
anthropics