搜尋
搜尋結果
965 results for "review"

prediction-market-risk-review
Review prediction-market, basket, oracle, and trading-agent workflows for compliance, safety, data-quality, privacy, and execution risk. Use before any workflow handles venue auth, user portfolio data, API keys, or trade planning.
affaan-m
flutter-dart-code-review
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
affaan-m
security-review
Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.
affaan-m
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
obra
flutter-dart-code-review
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
affaan-m
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
obra
security-review
Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.
affaan-m
backend-code-review
Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of backend code under `api/`. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, frontend code, or backend code outside `api/`.
langgenius
frontend-code-review
Review Dify frontend code for correctness, accessibility, component design, dify-ui usage, data/query boundaries, performance, and tests. Trigger for `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`, UI, React, Next.js, pending-change, or focused frontend review requests.
langgenius
pr-review
Review PyTorch pull requests for code quality, test coverage, security, and backward compatibility. Use when reviewing PRs, when asked to review code changes, or when the user mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR".
pytorch
caveman-evidence-review
Review Caveman Cloud evidence read-only: costs, Cave Score, Cave Plan, workflows, traces, latency, errors, compression, routing, and verified savings. Use when the user asks what Caveman found, where LLM spend goes, why cost or quality changed, which workflows need attention, or asks for a trace or analytics review. Prefer Caveman MCP tools; fall back to CLI JSON.
juliusbrussee
weread-year-in-review-video-template
WeRead-inspired HyperFrames video template for vertical annual reading reports, personal reading dashboards, book-note recaps, and shareable year-in-review stories. Use when users want a 9:16 HTML-to-MP4 reading report with warm paper texture, editorial Chinese typography, book-page metaphors, data highlights, and deterministic motion.
nexu-io
html-ppt-retro-quarterly-review
Retro Quarterly Review presentation template in a bold blue + orange editorial language. Use when users ask for a high-impact quarterly review / roadmap deck with heavyweight slab headlines, clean cream paper sections, structured grids, and fast premium motion pacing (3 slides, each hold under 3s in video mode).
nexu-io
plan-design-review
Senior Designer review: rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, and flags AI Slop signals. Useful as a gate before merging UI work.
nexu-io
design-review
Designer Who Codes: visual audit then fixes with atomic commits and before/after screenshots. Useful for tightening shipped UI before launch.
nexu-io
ponytail-review
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
dietrichgebert
systematic-literature-review
Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review for reviewing one paper.
bytedance
code-review-and-quality
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
addyosmani
caveman-review
>
juliusbrussee
agent-reviewer
Agent skill for reviewer - invoke with $agent-reviewer
ruvnet
agent-code-review-swarm
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm
ruvnet
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
ruvnet
archify-review
Review Archify issues, PRs, or code through value, cost, and impact to support evidence-based maintenance decisions. Use for issue triage, change reviews, and code quality assessments.
tt-a1i
bmad-review
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.
bmad-code-org