
meticulous-zero-diff-task
Implement a task for which no visual diffs are expected end to end, using Meticulous to drive the implementation to a clean visual diff before opening a PR. Use when the task's whole premise is "the UI shouldn't change" — a dependency/version upgrade, a code refactor, a migration, or similar. Meticulous isn't just a final check here, it's the loop you iterate against while implementing.
Implement a task for which no visual diffs are expected end to end, using Meticulous to drive the implementation to a clean visual diff before opening a PR. Use when the task's whole premise is "the UI shouldn't change" — a dependency/version upgrade, a code refactor, a migration, or similar. Meticulous isn't just a final check here, it's the loop you iterate against while implementing.
To grind out a no-diff (or low-diff) implementation task, follow the workflow below step by step, using the CLI or MCP commands as described.
Before starting, run the
meticulous-cli-updateskill to ensure the Meticulous CLI and skills are up to date — unless it has already run earlier in this conversation, in which case skip it.
This skill is for tasks whose success criterion is visual stability, not visual change: dependency/version upgrades, refactors, migrations (e.g. framework/library swaps, build-tool changes), and similar work where any Meticulous diff is a sign something broke, not a feature to explain away. It also works for low-diff tasks (a handful of expected, well-understood visual changes alongside mostly-unchanged output) — the loop is the same, just with a smaller set of diffs you expect to end up justifying rather than fixing.
Step 1 -- Implement the task
Make the code change described by the task (the upgrade, refactor, or migration). Commit as you go if the task naturally breaks into steps — this isn't specific to Meticulous, just do the implementation work.
Step 2 -- Build the frontend
- Find out what build artefact Meticulous expects by checking your CI config for the corresponding step:
- GitHub:
.github/workflows/*.ymlforuses: alwaysmeticulous/report-diffs-action/upload-assets@v1(build assets) orupload-container@v1(docker image) - GitLab:
.gitlab-ci.yml(or an included.gitlab/ci/*.yml) fornpx @alwaysmeticulous/cli ci upload-assets(build assets) orci upload-container(docker image) - Bitbucket:
bitbucket-pipelines.ymlfor the samenpx @alwaysmeticulous/cli ci upload-assets/ci upload-containerstep
- GitHub:
- Build the frontend following the same instructions as used in that CI config.
Step 3 -- Upload the build and trigger a test run
# CLI
meticulous agent upload-build --appDirectory <path-to-build> # assets
meticulous agent upload-build --localImageTag <image-tag> # container
meticulous agent trigger-test-run --deploymentId <deploymentId>
# MCP (upload is not 1:1 — request an upload URL, upload the artifact yourself, then register it)
request_asset_upload(size=<zipByteSize>) # or request_container_upload() — no required args
# ... upload the zip/image to the returned URL/registry yourself ...
register_asset_build(uploadId="<id>", commitSha="<sha>") # or register_container_build(uploadId="<id>", commitSha="<sha>")
trigger_test_run(deploymentId="<deploymentId>", baseSha="<sha>")
trigger_test_run on MCP never infers baseSha/gitDiffOutput (compute the base locally) and always returns immediately without waiting for the run to finish (unlike the CLI, which blocks by default).
Run trigger-test-run from the repo directory to infer both the base (merge-base with the origin default branch) and the git diff automatically. See the meticulous-cli reference for the full option list — in particular, the working tree can be dirty (captured as an ephemeral commit) so you don't need to commit before each iteration below.
Note the testRunId from the output.
Step 4 -- Check for diffs, and iterate until clean
Inspect the diffs using the mechanics from the meticulous-review skill (Steps 1-4 there: agent test-run-diffs, screenshot images, DOM diff, timeline) — but apply this decision rule instead of the meticulous-review skill's expected-vs-regression framework:
For a no-diff task, treat every returned diff as a bug until proven otherwise. The premise of this skill is that the UI shouldn't change, so:
- No diffs at all — you're done with this step; proceed to Step 5.
- One or more diffs — for each one, look at the screenshot images and DOM diff (as in the
meticulous-reviewskill's Steps 2-3) to understand exactly what changed and why, using the timeline (Step 4 there) if the cause isn't obvious from the DOM/images alone. Then classify it:- Regression (the default assumption) — a real side effect of your change.
- Acceptable — you can positively explain it as an intended, unavoidable consequence of the task itself (e.g. a version-string footer changing as part of a version upgrade). Be conservative here — for a low-diff task there may genuinely be a handful of these; for a strict no-diff task there normally shouldn't be any. Don't reject or ignore these yet — hold off until Step 6, where the verdict gets filed against the PR's own CI-triggered run rather than a provisional local iteration.
- Can't fix, and can't confidently justify either — don't get stuck looping over it.
For a regression, reject it right away so there's a paper trail as you go — even though you're both reviewer and implementer here:
# CLI
meticulous agent reject-diff --replayDiffId=<id> --screenshotName=<name> --reason="<what broke>" --x=<0..1> --y=<0..1>
# MCP
reject_diff(replayDiffId="<id>", screenshotName="<name>", reason="<what broke>", x=<0..1>, y=<0..1>)
Then fix the code so the behavior/output matches the pre-change baseline, and go back to Step 3 to rebuild and re-run (new build, same base). Once a later run confirms that diff no longer reproduces, close the loop by replying "Fixed" to the comment thread — pass the id reject-diff returned as --commentId:
# CLI
meticulous agent reply-to-diff-comment --commentId=<id> --text="Fixed."
# MCP
reply_to_diff_comment(commentId="<id>", text="Fixed.")
A diff you can't fix and can't confidently justify gets rejected the same way, with a reason explaining what's blocking you so the thread reflects reality — but leave it unresolved (no "Fixed" reply), and call it out clearly and specifically in the final report and in the PR description (Step 5) so a human can make the call.
Repeat Steps 3-4 until either no diffs remain, or every remaining diff is justified or explicitly flagged as unresolved.
Step 5 -- Create the PR
Once the run is clean (or every remaining diff is accounted for), commit any outstanding changes, push the branch, and open the PR.
In the PR description:
- Summarize the task and, briefly, the Meticulous result: e.g. "Verified via Meticulous: no visual differences across the golden set" or, if some diffs remain, a short list of what they are and why they're expected/unavoidable — link each one:
https://app.meticulous.ai/test-runs/<testRunId>/replay-diff/<replayDiffId>?screenshot=<screenshotName>. - Author credit: if the PR description already credits an AI coding assistant as (co-)author (e.g. "Created by Claude Code", "Co-authored-by: Cursor", "🤖 Generated with Claude Code"), add "and Meticulous" to that mention — e.g. "Created by Claude Code and Meticulous" — since Meticulous drove the implementation loop, not just a final check. Don't add a Meticulous author credit if no such line already exists; there's nothing to append it to.
Step 6 -- Confirm the PR's own test run matches
Once CI has triggered its own Meticulous test run for the pushed commit, confirm it shows the same result you already validated locally — this catches drift between your local build and CI's build (e.g. a dependency lockfile mismatch, an env var only set in CI).
# CLI (resolves from local git HEAD — already the pushed commit)
meticulous agent test-run-diffs
# MCP (git context is never inferred — resolve the testRunId from the local HEAD commit first)
get_test_run_for_commit(commitSha="<sha>")
get_test_run_diffs(testRunId="<id>")
If CI hasn't triggered the run yet, wait and retry rather than re-triggering it yourself — the PR's run should come from the same CI pipeline a human reviewer will see. If the PR run shows different diffs than your local iteration did, treat that as a new signal: go back to Step 4 using the PR's testRunId.
For every diff that's still present here and that you justified rather than fixed (Step 4), leave your reasoning on the record via ignore-diff — this is the run CI and a human reviewer will actually see, so it's where that verdict needs to be filed:
# CLI
meticulous agent ignore-diff --replayDiffId=<id> --screenshotName=<name> --reason="<why it's justified>" --x=<0..1> --y=<0..1>
# MCP
ignore_diff(replayDiffId="<id>", screenshotName="<name>", reason="<why it's justified>", x=<0..1>, y=<0..1>)
ignore-diff decides nothing — the diff stays unreviewed and the check stays pending — but it puts your reasoning on record so the human reviewing the PR doesn't have to re-derive it.
Step 7 -- Report feedback to Meticulous
As the last step, submit one brief feedback note to the Meticulous team: did the iterate-to-clean loop work well for this kind of task, was anything confusing, and what would have made it easier?
# CLI
meticulous agent submit-feedback --message="<one or two sentences>" --outcome=<helped|neutral|hindered> --testRunId=<id> --skill=meticulous-zero-diff-task
# MCP
submit_feedback(message="<one or two sentences>", outcome="<helped|neutral|hindered>", testRunId="<id>", skill="meticulous-zero-diff-task")





