codex-delegate

codex-delegate

熱門

Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

979星標
101分支
更新於 2026/8/12
要求的譯文尚未完成,目前顯示原始英文。
SKILL.md
唯讀
名稱
codex-delegate
描述

Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

Codex Delegate

You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate
implementer — the OpenAI Codex CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write
the brief and own the judgment; Codex does the typing in its own sandbox; you verify and commit.

Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell
command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected
model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators
as designed-for, not yet proven.)

When NOT to use this

  • The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
  • The codex CLI is not installed or not authenticated (run codex login).
  • You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review (use Codex's own review command).

Prerequisites (check once)

  1. codex --version succeeds. If not, install (npm i -g @openai/codex) and codex login.
  2. Confirm which codex is on PATH. Multiple installs are common (e.g. a current npm/nvm copy and
    a stale Homebrew one). command -v codex shows the active one and codex --version its version —
    an old binary predates flags this skill relies on (codex exec --json, -o, exec resume). The
    relay also records the version it ran into result.json, so a stale binary is visible after the fact.
  3. You are in (or will point --cd at) the target git repository.

The loop

Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.

1. Write the brief

Codex sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context. Everything the
task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched,
the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile
do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Codex it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per
brief. Full guidance and a template: references/writing-the-brief.md.

2. Dispatch

Send the brief to Codex with the bundled helper. It wraps codex exec, captures the run, and writes a
structured result.json — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." (<skill-dir> below is
this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md, i.e. the directory you loaded
the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other
orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run
find ~ -name relay.mjs -path '*codex-delegate*' and substitute the directory above it.)

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis, no edits):   add --read-only
# continue the exact Codex session:         add --session <threadId>  (from result.json; send only the delta brief)
# fallback when no thread id is available:  add --resume-last
# hard time limit (watchdog):               add --timeout 2h  (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options:                          node .../relay.mjs --help

The helper defaults to a write-capable (workspace-write) sandbox and writes its artifacts to a temp
dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the
result.json shape: references/dispatch-and-poll.md.

3. Wait for completion

The helper blocks until Codex finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume
when it returns:

  • Claude Code: run the Bash call with run_in_background: true; you are notified on completion.
  • Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll
    the result file — … & in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL), or your shell's equivalent (Start-Job
    in PowerShell, start /b in cmd). The run is done when result.json exists with a status. (A
    pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and
    writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missing codex binary exits 127 but does write
    a result.json with status codex_unavailable.)

Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the
process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is
the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).

4. Review — do not trust the self-report

Codex's result.json includes its own summary and gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:

  • Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take
    "gates passed" on faith.
  • Read the diff against the brief: did Codex do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and
    nothing less? touchedFiles in the result is your starting point.
  • Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard,
    test-guard, etc. from guard-skills) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it.
  • For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.

Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.

5. Land it

Because Codex's sandbox cannot reliably write .git (it varies by version, OS, and path), the
orchestrator commits.
Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:

  • Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
  • If it needs changes, send a delta brief with --session <threadId> from the prior result.json
    (use --resume-last only when no thread id is available), and review again.

Read-only second opinions

The relay doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk: dispatch
--read-only with a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both
positions, and ask Codex to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no
files. Any delegation skill whose implementer offers a read-only mode supports the same use, but
check how hard that mode's guarantee is first: Codex's sandbox enforces it, while Grok's is
best-effort and only flagged after the fact (readOnlyViolation) — for those implementers,
verify touchedFiles came back empty instead of assuming no edits.

Authorization model

Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing
verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that
mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Codex's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and
non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct
completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment
is in references/review-and-land.md.

If you have the openai-codex plugin

The official openai-codex Claude Code plugin is excellent and complementarycodex-delegate
builds on the same codex CLI, it doesn't replace the plugin. They point in different directions:

  • The plugin's codex:codex-rescue agent is a forwarder: it hands one task to Codex and returns
    the output. It deliberately does not poll, review, or commit.
  • The plugin's review command and stop-review gate run the inverse direction: Codex reviews your work.
  • codex-delegate is the orchestration loop in the other direction: you drive Codex to
    implement across one task or a queue, and you review and land each result. That loop — brief →
    dispatch → poll → review → commit, with the orchestrator owning the commit — is what the plugin
    leaves to you, and what this skill encodes.

If you have the plugin installed, its companion CLI is an optional alternative dispatch backend; the
bundled relay.mjs is the default because it adds no install of its own beyond the codex binary
(Node and git, which the relay also needs, are prerequisites for every skill here).

References