defense-in-depth

defense-in-depth

Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible

7星標
2分支
更新於 1/17/2026
SKILL.md
readonlyread-only
name
defense-in-depth
description

Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug"
Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs
  • Business logic catches edge cases
  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

Layer 1: Entry Point Validation

Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary

function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
  if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
    throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
  }
  if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 2: Business Logic Validation

Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation

function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
  if (!projectDir) {
    throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 3: Environment Guards

Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts

async function gitInit(directory: string) {
  // In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
    const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
    const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));

    if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
      throw new Error(
        `Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
      );
    }
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation

Purpose: Capture context for forensics

async function gitInit(directory: string) {
  const stack = new Error().stack;
  logger.debug('About to git init', {
    directory,
    cwd: process.cwd(),
    stack,
  });
  // ... proceed
}

Applying the Pattern

When you find a bug:

  1. Trace the data flow - Where does bad value originate? Where used?
  2. Map all checkpoints - List every point data passes through
  3. Add validation at each layer - Entry, business, environment, debug
  4. Test each layer - Try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it

Example from Session

Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code

Data flow:

  1. Test setup → empty string
  2. Project.create(name, '')
  3. WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')
  4. git init runs in process.cwd()

Four layers added:

  • Layer 1: Project.create() validates not empty/exists/writable
  • Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates projectDir not empty
  • Layer 3: WorktreeManager refuses git init outside tmpdir in tests
  • Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init

Result: All 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce

Key Insight

All four layers were necessary. During testing, each layer caught bugs the others missed:

  • Different code paths bypassed entry validation
  • Mocks bypassed business logic checks
  • Edge cases on different platforms needed environment guards
  • Debug logging identified structural misuse

Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.

You Might Also Like

Related Skills

fix

fix

243Kdev-testing

Use when you have lint errors, formatting issues, or before committing code to ensure it passes CI.

facebook avatarfacebook
獲取
peekaboo

peekaboo

179Kdev-testing

Capture and automate macOS UI with the Peekaboo CLI.

openclaw avataropenclaw
獲取
frontend-testing

frontend-testing

128Kdev-testing

Generate Vitest + React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities. Triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, or write/review test requests.

langgenius avatarlanggenius
獲取
frontend-code-review

frontend-code-review

127Kdev-testing

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

langgenius avatarlanggenius
獲取
code-reviewer

code-reviewer

92Kdev-testing

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

google-gemini avatargoogle-gemini
獲取
session-logs

session-logs

90Kdev-testing

Search and analyze your own session logs (older/parent conversations) using jq.

moltbot avatarmoltbot
獲取