service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure

service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure

熱門

End-to-end Incident SLA setup for Service Cloud ITSM — creating a MilestoneType, an Incident-scoped SLA Policy (SlaProcess), attaching a Milestone with criteria, and wiring an Entitlement so Incidents derive an EntityMilestone with a computed TargetDate. Use when the user asks to configure SLA milestones on Incidents, create an SLA policy for Incident records, set up entitlement processes for ITSM, wire milestones so they appear on the Incident page, or enable SLA tracking for incident management. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user asks about Case entitlements or Case SLA (not Incident), querying existing SLA policies without setup intent, general Entitlement sObject CRUD unrelated to Incident, or Milestone queries for reporting purposes only.

979星標
331分支
更新於 2026/9/8
要求的譯文尚未完成,目前顯示原始英文。
SKILL.md
唯讀
名稱
service-itsm-agentic-setup-incident-sla-configure
描述

End-to-end Incident SLA setup for Service Cloud ITSM — creating a MilestoneType, an Incident-scoped SLA Policy (SlaProcess), attaching a Milestone with criteria, and wiring an Entitlement so Incidents derive an EntityMilestone with a computed TargetDate. Use when the user asks to configure SLA milestones on Incidents, create an SLA policy for Incident records, set up entitlement processes for ITSM, wire milestones so they appear on the Incident page, or enable SLA tracking for incident management. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user asks about Case entitlements or Case SLA (not Incident), querying existing SLA policies without setup intent, general Entitlement sObject CRUD unrelated to Incident, or Milestone queries for reporting purposes only.

Configuring Incident SLA (End-to-End)

Configures a complete Incident SLA pipeline for Service Cloud ITSM — the chain that derives an
EntityMilestone (with a computed TargetDate) on every Incident with an Entitlement. Every operation
runs through the Salesforce-hosted headless-360 MCP server; the org is derived from the OAuth
JWT — the skill never handles an org id, alias, or credentials. It also needs the org-level SLA Management for IT
Service
setup item (the Phase 0.5 gate — see below). Setup has four parts:
MilestoneType (what you measure) → SLA Policy (SlaProcess scoped to Incident, entry/exit
criteria) → Milestone (time trigger + filter criteria) → Entitlement (wired to an Account so
Incidents engage the SLA).

Scope

  • In scope: Creating MilestoneTypes, SLA Policies (SlaProcess), Milestones with criteria,
    Entitlements, and verifying SLA engagement on Incident records — all via headless-360 MCP.
  • In scope — prerequisite: checking and (on consent) enabling SLA Management for IT Service
    (Phase 0.5); halts if not fully enabled or consent declined.
  • In scope — predefined vs custom (Phase 0.6): offering the OOB Standard Support for Incidents
    policy (Incident only) vs a custom one.
  • Out of scope: Case SLA/entitlements; Assignment Rules; Escalation Rules; Notification
    Rules; general Entitlement CRUD not related to Incident SLA; SLA reporting.

Routes at a glance

Reads → mcp__headless-360__dispatch_readonly, writes → mcp__headless-360__dispatch. Both take raw
HTTP: {"url","method","body"?,"query_params"?}not {operation_id, arguments}. Response
envelope
: standard REST — read body from {status_code, body}. The full route table — create
MilestoneType / SLA Policy / Milestone, Entitlement, BusinessHours, test Incident, the Phase 0.5
feature calls, and the create-milestone-action op — with request/response shapes lives in
references/mcp-invocation.md.


Clarifying Questions

Ask only what you cannot infer from context (pre-populate; note "(from
conversation)"). Resolve the Phase 0.5 gate first.

  • Which org? headless-360 binds to the current OAuth session; confirm the target before mutating.
  • Milestone strategy? See Phase 1.4 (skipped per its skip conditions).
  • Target Account? For the Entitlement.
  • Milestone criteria? Default Status != Closed, plus pattern-specific filters.

Default suggestion: SLA Policy Incident SLA Policy, default BusinessHours, the Account the user
picks, Entitlement today → today + 1 year, milestone strategy resolved per Phase 1.4.


Workflow

All steps are sequential. Always read before you write. Every call goes through
mcp__headless-360__* tools.

Phase 0 — Reuse what the session already knows

Each Phase 1 read carries a skip-if-already-known clause: skip only when the same fact was
produced this session by a successful dispatch_readonly on the current org and unwritten since —
a user statement is never cache-eligible. Cacheable: master Incident Mgmt pref (step 1, only if
ENABLED), SLA feature + Versioning (Phase 0.5), Incident describe (3), BusinessHoursId (4), Account
id (5), SLA Connect ops indexed (2). When in doubt, re-check — a wrong skip on a live write is
worse than a re-read.

Phase 0.5 — SLA Management for IT Service prerequisite gate

Resolve this gate first, on its own. Reads are safe up front; confirm the org before any write.
"SLA Management for IT Service" is enabled only when both Simplified SLA Setup (feature
service-cloud-itsm-manage-sla-policies) and SLA Versioning
(EntitlementSettings.IsEntitlementVersioningEnabled) are on; either off → not enabled. The one
feature-enable turns on both, permanently enabling versioning — inseparable. Shapes /
enableBlockedReasons / ack wording: references/mcp-invocation.md.

  • Read both (dispatch_readonly); proceed to Phase 0.6 only when both are on.
  • On an OFF org, read the master license first (Phase 1 step 1, service-cloud-itsm-incident):
    NOT_AVAILABLEHALT — don't flip the permanent Versioning switch where Incident SLA can't run.
  • Two separate AskUserQuestion acks — never merge. (a) master Incident Mgmt NOT_ENABLED → ask
    to enable it first (reversible, no permanence warning). (b) a distinct permanence ack: enabling
    SLA Management turns on SLA Versioning, which can't be turned off (the feature disables
    later but Versioning stays on). Offer enable/stop — no "versioning-off"; a bare "enable SLA"
    is not consent.
  • Decline (b), non-empty enableBlockedReasons, or a re-read mismatch → HALT — enable no SLA
    Mgmt/Versioning, don't proceed to Phase 0.6/1 (a reversible master enable from (a) stands). After
    any write, re-read both and report the REAL state
    — never trust 201/204.

Phase 0.6 — Predefined (OOB) vs Custom

Once the gate passes, offer the OOB policy before any custom-flow questions. Incident only.

  1. Prerequisite + detect. Confirm master Incident Mgmt pref ENABLED (Phase 1 step 1). Then dispatch_readonly GET /connect/sla-management/sla-policies with
    query_params.processTypes=Incident; match display name "Standard Support for Incidents".
    • Already presentno re-seed (no idempotency), no custom upsell; report it is seeded.
      If warn/escalate actions were requested → resolve the named existing milestones → Phase 2.5 →
      Phase 3 verify → STOP
      (attach actions even though the policy was already seeded).
  2. Fork — one AskUserQuestion, Predefined listed first / recommended: use Salesforce's
    predefined Incident SLA policy (Standard Support for Incidents — priority-tiered milestones)
    or build a custom one. One-way note: predefined seeds an
    active policy + Entitlement, no un-seed path (manual delete only).
    • Predefined → resolve BusinessHours + Account (Phase 1 steps 4–5) → Phase 2-OOBPhase
      2.5
      (if actions requested) → Phase 3 verify → STOP.
    • Custom → existing Phase 1 → 1.4 → 1.5 → 2 → 3, unchanged.

MUST read references/mcp-invocation.md (Predefined Incident Policy) before seeding.

Phase 1 — Preflight & discovery

On any 401 / 403 / 404 from a step below, halt and surface the raw error — the org/client is misconfigured. 401 → MCP auth (ECA not propagated / expired token). 403 → user perm OR ITSM Incident Management license/pref missing (ITSMIncidentMgmtEnabled / IncidentMgmt.orgHasITSMOrgPermission). 404headless-360 not activated OR Entitlement Management not enabled for Incident.

  1. Master Incident Management pref — direct read (skip conditions in Phase 0).
    dispatch_readonly GET .../connect/setup/discovery/features, filter features[] to the exact
    apiName == "service-cloud-itsm-incident" — never a look-alike (service-cloud-incident-management
    is generic Case-based Incident Management, not our target). Read status: ENABLED → proceed;
    NOT_AVAILABLE (license missing) → halt and surface it — cannot be enabled here, no delegate/ack;
    NOT_ENABLEDexplicit AskUserQuestion ack first (never auto-enable as an implied SLA
    dependency)
    , then delegate to service-itsm-incident-mgmt-configure inline (confirms-to-write) and
    re-read; if declined, halt — every SLA artifact below depends on the master being on. Full shape + why
    setup-org-preferences 404s here: references/mcp-invocation.md (Preflight A).
  2. Discover the Connect operations(skip if already verified this session — see Phase 0).
    mcp__headless-360__discover(query="sla-management milestone") to confirm the SLA Management
    Connect API is indexed, then mcp__headless-360__describe(id=<operation_id>)
    for the milestone-types, sla-policies, and sla-policies/{id}/milestones POST operations to pull
    their exact input schemas + HTTP routes. If discover returns nothing after rewording the query,
    the corpus does not index this surface for the org — direct the user to Setup → SLA/Entitlement
    setup
    and stop.
  3. Verify Incident Management + SLA fields(skip if Incident.describe result for the
    current org is already in context — see Phase 0)
    . Otherwise dispatch_readonly on
    GET /services/data/v67.0/sobjects/Incident/describe and confirm fields[] includes
    EntitlementId, SlaStartDate, SlaExitDate. If the describe 404s or fields are missing, direct
    the user to enable Entitlement Management for Incident and stop.
  4. Find default BusinessHours(skip if BusinessHoursId for the current org's default is
    already captured this session)
    . Otherwise dispatch_readonly on GET /services/data/v67.0/query with
    query_params.q="SELECT Id, Name FROM BusinessHours WHERE IsActive = true AND IsDefault = true".
    If body.records is empty, stop with a message to create default Business Hours in Setup. Capture
    BusinessHoursId.
  5. Resolve the target Account(skip if already resolved this session). Phase 2's Entitlement
    needs an AccountId. If the user named one → look up (SELECT Id, Name FROM Account WHERE Name = '<escaped>' LIMIT 1); not found → stop and ask, never substitute. If the user authorized
    any/existing Account
    → pick the most recently active (... WHERE IsDeleted = false ORDER BY LastModifiedDate DESC LIMIT 1) and surface which in the plan. Otherwise → ask via
    AskUserQuestion
    : list real candidates by name only + "type a name"; never auto-pick,
    pre-select, or expose an internal sort key
    (e.g. recency). If none exists, stop. Capture AccountId + name.
  6. Read existing SLA artifacts (idempotency probe)dispatch_readonly SOQL for SlaProcess by
    name (... WHERE Name = '<name>' AND SobjectType = 'Incident' — the field is SobjectType;
    ProcessType returns INVALID_FIELD), each MilestoneType the strategy would create,
    SlaMilestone under the matched policy, and Entitlement by name on the resolved Account. If
    every artifact already exists with the requested config, set noOp=true and skip Phase 1.4 +
    Phase 2 (skip condition (b)); any missing/divergent artifact → proceed to Phase 1.4.

Phase 1.4 — Milestone Strategy

Every SLA policy needs at least one milestone. Load examples/milestone-patterns.md — it lists the
skip conditions (concrete shape in prompt / idempotent no-op / explicit up-front authorization) and
the five strategy options with their AskUserQuestion prompt, defaults, and MilestoneType-reuse
rules. Skip condition (c) still requires Phase 1.5 plan-narration before dispatch. Multi-milestone
selection expands to N creates in Phase 2 step 10 (one POST per milestone, order 1..N, same SlaProcess).

Phase 1.5 — Confirm before mutating

  1. Confirm the plan — present the resolved config (target org, SLA Policy name, resolved
    Account name, Entitlement date range, and the full per-milestone list — never collapse
    Priority-tiered / Custom to "N milestones"). Skip the AskUserQuestion (but still narrate the
    plan before dispatch) when up-front authorization was granted (note (authorized in prompt)), the
    branch is a no-op, or it was already confirmed in conversation (note (confirmed in conversation));
    otherwise require an explicit "yes" before Phase 2. Everything before this step is read-only;
    everything after mutates the org.

Phase 2 — Create SLA Artifacts (exact order — each depends on the previous)

  1. Create MilestoneType(s)POST /connect/sla-management/milestone-types. One POST per
    distinct MilestoneType required by the strategy. Reuse a single MilestoneType across milestones
    that share a name (Priority-tiered "First Response" reuses one MilestoneType across all four
    milestones); create separate MilestoneTypes for distinct concerns (Response + Resolution =
    two MilestoneTypes; Escalation ladder = three). Capture each id.
  2. Create SLA PolicyPOST /connect/sla-management/sla-policies with processType='Incident'
    and the businessHourId from Phase 1. Capture id. The response echoes nulls — verify via
    SOQL, not the response body.
  3. Attach Milestone(s) — load the request-body template from assets/attach-milestone.json
    and, for each milestone in the strategy, populate milestoneTypeId, timeTrigger, order
    (1..N in the strategy's order) and any per-pattern filterItems additions from
    examples/milestone-patterns.md, then POST /connect/sla-management/sla-policies/<slaId>/milestones.
    Each milestoneCriteria[] item needs milestoneAgreementType (SLA/OLA) and
    filterType: RuleFilter. Do not put slaProcessId in the body — carried by the path.
    Multi-milestone strategies dispatch once per milestone; on any milestone POST failure, halt
    and surface the raw error — do not continue with a half-attached policy.
  4. Create EntitlementPOST /sobjects/Entitlement linking the resolved Account (from Phase 1
    step 5), the SLA Policy (SlaProcessId), and Business Hours. For immediate engagement, backdate
    StartDate to yesterday.

Phase 2-OOB — Seed the Predefined Incident Policy

Reached only from Phase 0.6 Predefined (replaces Phase 1.4/1.5/2). Follow the seed recipe
in references/mcp-invocation.md (Predefined Incident Policy) with the template in
assets/predefined-incident-policy.json — it uses the Phase 2 routes (2 MilestoneTypes → SLA
Policy active:true → 8 priority-tiered milestones → Entitlement), validates each Priority/Status
against the live picklist, and avoids the Connect activate PATCH. Then run Phase 2.5 (if actions
requested), then Phase 3 (Critical test Incident), and STOP — no proactive custom offer.

Phase 2.5 — Milestone Actions (optional: Warn / Escalate)

After milestones exist (Phase 2 or 2-OOB), only if the user asked to warn/escalate/notify: apply
the requested checkpoint(s) to every milestone the user named (not just one), computing each
offset from that milestone's own target. Map "warn at X%" → an offset before target, "on breach" →
at/after it; confirm the full set before writing (up-front auth waives the re-ask; narrate it
regardless — no headless delete), then, per milestone, delegate to headless
create-milestone-action (discoverdescribedispatch). Confirm each from the response
body
(success + non-empty actionMappings; a timed checkpoint also returns a triggerId), never
the 201. Formula, roles, proven body, defaults, and the IST business-hours note:
references/mcp-invocation.md (Milestone Actions).

Phase 3 — Verify

  1. Verify the SLA Policy — SOQL on SlaProcess (do not trust the create response).
  2. Create a test Incident with EntitlementId set to the new Entitlement. For Priority-tiered
    strategies, set a Priority that matches at least one milestone's criteria (or one test Incident
    per Priority) — otherwise no EntityMilestone spawns even with the policy wired correctly.
  3. Verify engagement — SOQL confirming Incident.SlaStartDate is populated and the expected
    EntityMilestone row(s) exist with correct TargetDate(s) — one per milestone whose criteria
    the Incident satisfies.
  4. Report results using the output format below.

Rules / Constraints

Constraint Rationale
Gate on SLA Management for IT Service first (Phase 0.5) — one enable turns on the feature and, one-way, SLA Versioning; two separate acks (master, then permanence) — never merged; decline / blocked / verify-fail → HALT, no fall-through; re-read + report real state Versioning can't be undone; writes don't confirm state
Offer the predefined (OOB) policy first (Phase 0.6, Incident only); detect before seed; if chosen, seed → verify → STOP (no custom upsell) OOB seed has no server idempotency (re-seeding duplicates)
Discover + describe before any mutation Catches a missing SLA surface / disabled Incident Management early
Ask (via AskUserQuestion) which milestone strategy to use — don't silently default to Single Real ITSM policies usually have >1 milestone; a silent default hides it
Reuse one MilestoneType per shared name; create a distinct one per distinct concern The runtime keys milestones by MilestoneType — sharing collapses distinct concerns
For multi-milestone strategies, halt on any milestone POST failure (no half-attached policy) Partial attach diverges from the confirmed plan
Priority-tiered: validate every Priority value against the live Incident picklist before dispatch The server accepts any string on filterItems.value — an unknown value silently makes the milestone dead code
Entitlement is standard sObject DML (not Connect API); StartDate controls status (future = Inactive) Not part of the /connect/sla-management/ surface
Verify SLA Policy via SOQL, not the create response The create response echoes nulls
Never show record IDs in any message, incl. interim narration — the test Incident by IncidentNumber, milestones by MilestoneType name, never the 15/18-char Id; keep AskUserQuestion labels customer-facing (no "demo", "the skill", internal defaults) Leaked Ids and internal/demo framing look unprofessional

Additional API quirks (payload rules, operator enum, missing-criteria error): references/mcp-invocation.md.


Verification Checklist

  • [ ] SLA Management gated (Phase 0.5) — feature + SLA Versioning both on, only after the permanence ack (separate from the master ack); reported state matches a re-read, not the write. If it couldn't be enabled (declined / blocked / verify-fail), the run HALTED before Phase 0.6/1 — no artifacts.
  • [ ] Predefined vs Custom offered (Phase 0.6) — with the feature ON, the OOB Standard Support for Incidents policy was offered first; if it existed, reported not re-seeded; if chosen, seeded (2 MilestoneTypes + 8 tiered milestones + Entitlement), verified, no custom offer followed.
  • [ ] Master Incident Mgmt pref (exact service-cloud-itsm-incident) confirmed ENABLED via a live read, or delegated to service-itsm-incident-mgmt-configure when NOT_ENABLED (NOT_AVAILABLE → HALT) — not a user assertion, not a look-alike.
  • [ ] discover/describe (or the Incident describe) confirmed the SLA Connect operations.
  • [ ] Incident describe returned 200 with EntitlementId, SlaStartDate, SlaExitDate.
  • [ ] Default BusinessHours found.
  • [ ] Milestone strategy resolved — via a Phase 1.4 skip condition OR AskUserQuestion; for Priority-tiered / Custom, every Priority/criteria value was validated against the live Incident picklist before dispatch.
  • [ ] Configuration confirmed OR skip condition met (up-front authorization / no-op / prior confirmation / explicit "yes"); the resolved plan (org, SLA name, account, entitlement range, per-milestone list) was narrated before Phase 2.
  • [ ] Artifacts created in order (MilestoneType(s) → Policy → Milestone(s) → Entitlement); each POST 201; any milestone POST failure halted the run (no partial attach). Trivial on no-op runs.
  • [ ] Milestone actions (Phase 2.5) — if requested, attached to every named milestone; each confirmed from body.success + actionMappings, not the 201; full set narrated before write.
  • [ ] SLA Policy verified via SOQL, not the create response (on no-op, the Phase-1 read is the verification).
  • [ ] Test Incident has SlaStartDate populated (Priority chosen to match a criterion for Priority-tiered) and ≥1 EntityMilestone with the correct TargetDate; expected milestone(s) present for multi-milestone. Skip on no-op.
  • [ ] Before/after + summary shown; on no-op, the summary states the pre-existing configuration verbatim and reports "no changes made".

Output Format

See examples/output-templates.md for the canonical failure / single-milestone success / multi-milestone success templates. Fill in the placeholders as-is. No files are produced — the skill mutates org configuration in place through headless-360 MCP dispatch.


Reference File Index

File When to read
references/mcp-invocation.md Every phase — exact mcp__headless-360__* call shapes, payload templates, response envelope, discovery, and gotchas (filter-operator enum, v67 routes, entitlement behavior)
examples/milestone-patterns.md Phase 1.4 — the five milestone strategies with default times, criteria, MilestoneType reuse rules, and per-pattern filter-item extensions
examples/output-templates.md Output Format — canonical failure / single-milestone success / multi-milestone success templates
assets/attach-milestone.json Phase 2 step 10 — request-body template for the milestone POST (sla-policies/<slaId>/milestones); substitute milestoneTypeId, businessHoursId, timeTrigger, order; append per-pattern filterItems
assets/predefined-incident-policy.json Phase 0.6 / Phase 2-OOB — the OOB Standard Support for Incidents seed template (policy + 2 MilestoneTypes + 8 priority-tiered milestones)
assets/attach-milestone-action.json Phase 2.5 — Warn/Escalate milestone-action body templates (Field Update); pair with references/mcp-invocation.md (Milestone Actions)

Related Skills

The priority matrix (Impact × Urgency → Priority) is separate — service-itsm-incident-priority-configure;
if a Priority-tiered strategy is requested but Incident.Priority is missing values, direct the user
there first. Other adjacent ITSM flows (Major Incident Mgmt, custom fields on Incident/Problem/ChangeRequest)
are out of scope.