搜索

搜索结果

48 results for "prompting reasoning"

thought-based-reasoning

thought-based-reasoning

1.5Kprompting-reasoning

Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns

neolabhq avatarneolabhq
获取
investigate-first

investigate-first

98Kprompting-reasoning

Diagnose ambiguous failures before editing. Use for unknown causes, intermittent behavior, performance regressions, or investigations needing evidence-ranked hypotheses.

juliusbrussee avatarjuliusbrussee
获取
prompt-master

prompt-master

11Kprompting-reasoning

Generates optimized prompts for AI tools. Activates only when the user explicitly asks to write, fix, improve, or adapt a prompt for a specific AI tool (LLM, Cursor, Midjourney, image AI, video AI, coding agents, etc.). Does not activate for general conversation, coding tasks, document writing, or other non-prompt-engineering work.

nidhinjs avatarnidhinjs
获取
caveman

caveman

72Kprompting-reasoning

超压缩沟通模式。通过像穴居人一样说话,减少约75%的令牌使用,同时保持完整的技术准确性。支持强度级别:lite、full(默认)、ultra、wenyan-lite、wenyan-full、wenyan-ultra。当用户说“caveman mode”、“talk like caveman”、“use caveman”、“less tokens”、“be brief”或调用/caveman时使用。当请求令牌效率时也会自动触发。

juliusbrussee avatarjuliusbrussee
获取
llm-council

llm-council

2.1Kprompting-reasoning

Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.

aiwithremy avataraiwithremy
获取
tao-generate-video-reasoning-annotations

tao-generate-video-reasoning-annotations

3.1Kprompting-reasoning

Multi-step video annotation pipeline that turns raw videos into Chain-of-Thought training data — multi-level captions, structured descriptions, and QA pairs (MCQ, binary, open-ended) with reasoning traces, via VLM/LLM distillation. Use when the user wants to "create video training data", "generate video QA datasets", "build CoT reasoning traces from videos", "auto-label videos", or run the video_reasoning_annotation pipeline. Triggers include "video annotation", "video CoT", "video QA", "chain-of-thought", "video captioning pipeline", "video distillation".

nvidia avatarnvidia
获取
sequential-thinking

sequential-thinking

2.2Kprompting-reasoning

Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.

mrgoonie avatarmrgoonie
获取
prompt-optimizer

prompt-optimizer

1.3Kproductivity

Transform vague prompts into precise, well-structured specifications using EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) methodology. This skill should be used when users provide loose requirements, ambiguous feature descriptions, or need to enhance prompts for AI-generated code, products, or documents. Triggers include requests to "optimize my prompt", "improve this requirement", "make this more specific", or when raw requirements lack detail and structure.

daymade avatardaymade
获取
seedance-v2

seedance-v2

2prompting-reasoning

>

runcomfy-com avatarruncomfy-com
获取
bmad-deep-recon

bmad-deep-recon

53Kresearch-knowledge

Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"

bmad-code-org avatarbmad-code-org
获取
dataverse-python-quickstart

dataverse-python-quickstart

37Kprompting-reasoning

使用官方模式生成 Python SDK 设置、CRUD、批量操作和分页代码片段。

github avatargithub
获取
prompt-engineering

prompt-engineering

1.5Kprompting-reasoning

Use this skill when you writing commands, hooks, skills for Agent, or prompts for sub agents or any other LLM interaction, including optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.

neolabhq avatarneolabhq
获取
eli5

eli5

1.3Kprompting-reasoning

Explain any topic, code, concept, or error tailored to a specific audience's level of understanding. Use this skill whenever the user says 'explain like I am', 'ELI5', 'explain this to my', 'break this down for', 'dumb it down', 'simplify this for', or asks you to explain something to a specific person or audience type (e.g., 'explain this to a manager', 'how would I explain this to my mom', 'make this understandable for a 5th grader'). Also trigger when the user mentions wanting to understand something at a particular level, or asks for an explanation targeting a non-technical audience. Even partial matches like 'explain to my wife' or 'tell my boss' should trigger this skill.

dreambigou avatardreambigou
获取
shuorenhua

shuorenhua

1.7Kprompting-reasoning

按用户要求审稿或去 AI 味,支持中英文;保留事实、术语与责任主体,支持只标问题。

mrgediao avatarmrgediao
获取
philosopher

philosopher

139research-knowledge

A cross-cutting cognitive mode for sitting with design problems before rushing to solve them. Part of the Intent design strategy system. Activates expansive brainstorming: hyperassociativity, beginner's mind, cross-domain pattern recognition, and suppression of premature idea-dismissal. Works alongside every Intent skill — strategize uses it to reframe briefs, blueprint to question structural assumptions, journey to rethink interaction models, and specify to stress-test specs. Trigger when the user invokes "expansive mode", "philosopher mode", "sit with this", "brainstorm", "explore this problem", or says things like "go weird with it", "don't filter yourself", "what connections are you not making", "think about this differently", or "I'm stuck". This is a reasoning protocol, not a persona — Claude's voice stays grounded but the cognitive process changes significantly.

ghaida avatarghaida
获取
seedance-v2

seedance-v2

2prompting-reasoning

>

doany-ai avatardoany-ai
获取
discernment-nudge

discernment-nudge

172Kresearch-knowledge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

anthropics avataranthropics
获取
test-prompt

test-prompt

1.7Kprompting-reasoning

Use when creating or editing any prompt (commands, hooks, skills, subagent instructions) to verify it produces desired behavior - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to prompt engineering using subagents for isolated testing

neolabhq avatarneolabhq
获取
prompt-engineering

prompt-engineering

46Kprompting-reasoning

Expert guide on prompt engineering patterns, best practices, and optimization techniques. Use when user wants to improve prompts, learn prompting strategies, or debug agent behavior.

sickn33 avatarsickn33
获取
storytelling

storytelling

135research-knowledge

Discipline for giving design work narrative structure that makes people care. Provides four canonical patterns — protagonist-arc, choreography, situation/complication/resolution, what-is/what-could-be — each with a goal, shape, and named pathology. Use when design work needs narrative structure, when stakeholders need to see the user's experience as a story, when presenting design rationale to non-design audiences, or when a journey, blueprint, brief, or deck feels lifeless. Trigger phrases: "what's the story here?", "tell the story", "story mode", "narrative mode". Restated inline in journey, blueprint, strategize, evaluate (and presentation when that skill ships). Refuses to smooth user data into clean arcs, manufacture strategic tension, substitute emotional appeal for evidence, assume conflict arcs are universal, or engineer stakeholder assent by shortcut.

ghaida avatarghaida
获取
breakdown-epic-pm

breakdown-epic-pm

36Kprompting-reasoning

用于创建新Epic的产品需求文档(PRD)的提示。该PRD将作为生成技术架构规范的输入。

github avatargithub
获取
phoenix-tracing

phoenix-tracing

11Kprompting-reasoning

OpenInference semantic conventions and instrumentation for Phoenix AI observability. Use when implementing LLM tracing, creating custom spans, or deploying to production.

arize-ai avatararize-ai
获取
manim-composer

manim-composer

1Kresearch-knowledge

Trigger when: (1) User wants to create an educational/explainer video, (2) User has a vague concept they want visualized, (3) User mentions "3b1b style" or "explain like 3Blue1Brown", (4) User wants to plan a Manim video or animation sequence, (5) User asks to "compose" or "plan" a math/science visualization. Transforms vague video ideas into detailed scene-by-scene plans (scenes.md). Conducts research, asks clarifying questions about audience/scope/focus, and outputs comprehensive scene specifications ready for implementation with ManimCE or ManimGL. Use this BEFORE writing any Manim code. This skill plans the video; use manimce-best-practices or manimgl-best-practices for implementation.

adithya-s-k avataradithya-s-k
获取
prompt-optimizer

prompt-optimizer

239Kfrontend

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

affaan-m avataraffaan-m
获取