搜索
搜索结果
965 results for "review"
prediction-market-risk-review
Review prediction-market, basket, oracle, and trading-agent workflows for compliance, safety, data-quality, privacy, and execution risk. Use before any workflow handles venue auth, user portfolio data, API keys, or trade planning.
affaan-mflutter-dart-code-review
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
affaan-msecurity-review
Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.
affaan-m
receiving-code-review
用于接收代码审查反馈时，在实施建议之前，特别是当反馈看起来不明确或技术上可疑时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非表演性同意或盲目实施
obraflutter-dart-code-review
与库无关的 Flutter/Dart 代码审查清单，涵盖 Widget 最佳实践、状态管理模式（BLoC、Riverpod、Provider、GetX、MobX、Signals）、Dart 惯用法、性能、无障碍、安全性和整洁架构。
affaan-mrequesting-code-review
完成任务、实现主要功能或合并前使用，以验证工作是否符合要求
obrasecurity-review
在添加身份验证、处理用户输入、使用密钥、创建API端点或实现支付/敏感功能时使用此技能。提供全面的安全检查清单和模式。
affaan-m
backend-code-review
Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of backend code under `api/`. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, frontend code, or backend code outside `api/`.
langgeniusfrontend-code-review
审查 Dify 前端代码的正确性、可访问性、组件设计、dify-ui 使用、数据/查询边界、性能和测试。触发条件为 `.tsx`、`.ts`、`.js`、UI、React、Next.js、待变更或聚焦前端审查请求。
langgenius
pr-review
审查 PyTorch 的 Pull Request（PR），重点检查代码质量、测试覆盖率、安全性以及向下兼容性（BC）。适用于 PR 审查、代码变更评审，或者当用户提及“review PR”、“code review”、“帮我看下这个 PR”等场景。
pytorch
caveman-evidence-review
Review Caveman Cloud evidence read-only: costs, Cave Score, Cave Plan, workflows, traces, latency, errors, compression, routing, and verified savings. Use when the user asks what Caveman found, where LLM spend goes, why cost or quality changed, which workflows need attention, or asks for a trace or analytics review. Prefer Caveman MCP tools; fall back to CLI JSON.
juliusbrussee
weread-year-in-review-video-template
WeRead-inspired HyperFrames video template for vertical annual reading reports, personal reading dashboards, book-note recaps, and shareable year-in-review stories. Use when users want a 9:16 HTML-to-MP4 reading report with warm paper texture, editorial Chinese typography, book-page metaphors, data highlights, and deterministic motion.
nexu-iohtml-ppt-retro-quarterly-review
Retro Quarterly Review presentation template in a bold blue + orange editorial language. Use when users ask for a high-impact quarterly review / roadmap deck with heavyweight slab headlines, clean cream paper sections, structured grids, and fast premium motion pacing (3 slides, each hold under 3s in video mode).
nexu-ioplan-design-review
Senior Designer review: rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, and flags AI Slop signals. Useful as a gate before merging UI work.
nexu-iodesign-review
“懂代码的设计师”实战模式：先进行视觉审计，再通过原子提交（atomic commits）自动修复并附带修改前后对比截图。适合在发布前对已完成的 UI 进行细节精修与视觉打磨。
nexu-io
ponytail-review
专注于过度工程的代码审查。找出可以删除的内容：重新发明的标准库、不必要的依赖、投机性抽象、死掉的灵活性。每个发现一行：位置、要删除的内容、替代方案。当用户说“审查过度工程”、“我们可以删除什么”、“这是否过度工程”、“简化审查”或调用 /ponytail-review 时使用。补充以正确性为重点的审查，此审查仅寻找复杂性。
dietrichgebert
systematic-literature-review
Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review for reviewing one paper.
bytedance
code-review-and-quality
执行多维度代码审查。在合并任何变更之前使用。在审查自己、其他智能体或人类编写的代码时使用。当需要在代码进入主分支之前从多个维度评估代码质量时使用。
addyosmanicaveman-review
超精简代码审查评论。去除PR反馈中的废话，保留可操作的关键信息。每条评论仅一行：位置、问题、修复。当用户说“review this PR”、“code review”、“review the diff”、“/review”或调用/caveman-review时使用。审查拉取请求时自动触发。
juliusbrussee
agent-reviewer
Agent skill for reviewer - invoke with $agent-reviewer
ruvnetagent-code-review-swarm
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm
ruvnetgithub-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
ruvnet
archify-review
Review Archify issues, PRs, or code through value, cost, and impact to support evidence-based maintenance decisions. Use for issue triage, change reviews, and code quality assessments.
tt-a1i
bmad-review
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.
bmad-code-org