signed-audit-trails-recipe

signed-audit-trails-recipe

热门

Step-by-step cookbook for setting up cryptographically signed audit trails on Claude Code tool calls. Use when explaining, evaluating, or demonstrating the pattern before committing to the protect-mcp runtime hooks. Covers Cedar policy, Ed25519 receipts, offline verification, tamper detection, CI/CD integration, and SLSA composition.

4万Star
4273Fork
更新于 2026/9/29
请求的译文尚未完成,当前显示原始英文。
SKILL.md
只读
名称
signed-audit-trails-recipe
描述

Step-by-step cookbook for setting up cryptographically signed audit trails on Claude Code tool calls. Use when explaining, evaluating, or demonstrating the pattern before committing to the protect-mcp runtime hooks. Covers Cedar policy, Ed25519 receipts, offline verification, tamper detection, CI/CD integration, and SLSA composition.

Signed Audit Trails for Claude Code Tool Calls

Cookbook-style walkthrough for cryptographically signed receipts on every
Claude Code tool call. This is the teaching skill. For the runtime
implementation, install the protect-mcp plugin.

What this gives you

Every tool call (Bash, Edit, Write, WebFetch) is:

  1. Evaluated against a Cedar policy before execution. If the policy denies
    the call, the tool does not run.
  2. Signed as an Ed25519 receipt after execution. Receipts are
    JCS-canonical and verifiable offline by anyone with the public key.

An auditor, regulator, or counterparty can verify every receipt later
(Step 5). No network call, no vendor lookup, no trust in the operator.

When to use the pattern

  • Regulated environments (finance, healthcare, critical infrastructure)
    where you need tamper-evident evidence of agent behavior
  • CI/CD pipelines where you want to prove that a policy gate held for
    every automated build step
  • Multi-party collaboration where a counterparty wants to verify your
    agent's behavior without trusting your operator
  • Compliance contexts (EU AI Act Article 12, SLSA provenance for
    agent-built software) where standard logging is not sufficient

Step 1: Install the hook configuration

Install the protect-mcp plugin with /plugin install protect-mcp. Its hooks
run evaluate.sh before each tool call and sign.sh after it. Both scripts
read the hook event from stdin, because Claude Code sets no TOOL_NAME or
TOOL_INPUT variables. See
references/hook-wiring.md for the hook
configuration and what each script passes to protect-mcp.

protect-mcp 0.7.4 does not create the signing key, and without a key the
receipts are unsigned. Create ./protect-mcp.key once. The command never
replaces an existing key:

if [ ! -e ./protect-mcp.key ]; then
  d=$(mktemp -d) && npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 init --dir "$d" && mv "$d/keys/gateway.json" ./protect-mcp.key
fi

Give auditors the publicKey value from that file. Do not commit the file,
because it also holds the private key.

Add the private key and receipt directory to .gitignore:

echo "/protect-mcp.key" >> .gitignore
echo "/receipts/" >> .gitignore

Step 2: Write a Cedar policy

Create ./protect.cedar from the example in
references/cedar-policy.md. It allows read-only
tools and a short list of Bash commands, denies shell chaining and destructive
commands, and limits writes to the project with .. segments denied.

Step 3: Use Claude Code normally

Start Claude Code. Every tool call goes through both hooks:

You: Please read the README and summarize it.

Claude: I will read README.md.
  [PreToolUse: Read ./README.md -> allow]
  [Tool: Read executes]
  [PostToolUse: receipt rcpt-a8f3c9d2 signed to ./receipts/]

... summary of README ...

A session of 20 tool calls appends 20 receipts to ./receipts/receipts.jsonl.

Step 4: Inspect a receipt

protect-mcp 0.7.4 appends each receipt as one line of
./receipts/receipts.jsonl. Print the newest one:

tail -n 1 ./receipts/receipts.jsonl | python3 -m json.tool

The receipt is a signed v2 envelope that names the tool, and it holds no
public key. See references/receipt-format.md
for a sample and the signed fields.

Step 5: Verify the receipts

Pass the publicKey value from ./protect-mcp.key to the verifier:

PUB=$(node -p 'JSON.parse(require("fs").readFileSync("./protect-mcp.key")).publicKey')
npx @veritasacta/verify@0.9.2 --replay-chain ./receipts/receipts.jsonl --key "$PUB"

Exit codes:

Code Meaning
0 Every receipt verified
1 A receipt failed verification (tampered, wrong key, or malformed line)
2 The receipts file could not be read

Step 6: Demonstrate tamper detection

Change the newest receipt's decision from allow to deny:

python3 -c "
import json
path = './receipts/receipts.jsonl'
lines = open(path).read().splitlines()
r = json.loads(lines[-1])
r['payload']['decision'] = 'deny'
lines[-1] = json.dumps(r)
open(path, 'w').write('\n'.join(lines) + '\n')
"

npx @veritasacta/verify@0.9.2 --replay-chain ./receipts/receipts.jsonl --key "$PUB"

The verifier exits with code 1 and reports which line failed. The
Ed25519 signature no longer matches the JCS-canonical bytes of the
tampered payload.

Restore the field and verification passes again.

How the cryptography works

Two invariants make receipts verifiable offline across any conformant
implementation:

  1. JCS canonicalization (RFC 8785) before signing. Keys sorted,
    whitespace minimized, strings NFC-normalized. Two independent
    implementations produce byte-identical signing payloads for the same
    receipt content.
  2. Ed25519 signatures (RFC 8032) over the canonical bytes.
    Deterministic, fixed-size, no nonce dependency.

protect-mcp 0.7.4 receipts carry no link to the previous receipt, so a
deleted receipt goes undetected.

For the formal wire format see
draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts.

Cross-implementation interop

The receipt format has four independent implementations today:

Implementation Language Use case
protect-mcp TypeScript Claude Code, Cursor, MCP hosts
protect-mcp-adk Python Google Agent Development Kit
sb-runtime Rust OS-level sandbox (Landlock + seccomp)
APS governance hook Python CrewAI, LangChain

A receipt produced by any of them verifies against
@veritasacta/verify.
The auditor does not need to trust the operator's tooling choice: the format
is the contract.

CI/CD integration

Verify receipts in CI so a tampered receipt fails the build.
references/ci-cd.md has a GitHub Actions workflow
that runs on pushes to the default branch. It installs the signing key from a
branch-limited environment, runs the agent, verifies the receipts, and uploads
them. It does not run on pull requests, because that would hand the key to
unreviewed code.

Composition with SLSA provenance for agent-built software

When Claude Code builds and releases software (running npm install,
npm build, npm publish as tool calls), the receipt chain is the
per-step build log. SLSA Provenance v1 has an extension point for this: the
byproducts field can reference the receipt chain alongside the build
attestation.

The agent-commit build type
documents the pattern using the ResourceDescriptor shape:

{
  "name": "decision-receipts",
  "digest": { "sha256": "..." },
  "uri": "oci://registry/org/build-xyz/receipts:sha256-...",
  "annotations": {
    "predicateType": "https://veritasacta.com/attestation/decision-receipt/v0.1",
    "signerRole": "supervisor-hook"
  }
}

The SLSA provenance is signed by the builder identity; the receipt
attestation is signed by the supervisor-hook identity. Two trust domains,
cross-referenced at the byproduct layer. See
slsa-framework/slsa#1594
for the composition discussion.

Common pitfalls

Private key in version control. The generated ./protect-mcp.key must
not be committed. The examples above add it to .gitignore. If a key is
accidentally committed, rotate it immediately. Move the key and
./receipts/receipts.jsonl to an archive, then run the Step 1 command again.
Verify the archived receipts with the old public key.

Hook payload on stdin. Claude Code sets no $TOOL_NAME or $TOOL_INPUT
variables. A hook command that passes --tool "$TOOL_NAME" sends an empty
tool name, so the policy denies every call. Read the payload from stdin as the
plugin scripts do.

Receipts directory in CI. If Claude Code runs in CI, upload receipts as
an artifact at the end of the job or the receipts are lost at job end.

Policy is missing. When ./protect.cedar does not exist, evaluate.sh
prints a warning to stderr and allows the call. No call is gated until you
create the policy in Step 2.

Related in this marketplace

  • protect-mcp — the runtime hook implementation
    (use this plugin in production)
  • review-agent-governance — require
    human approval before review-surface actions; composes with protect-mcp

References