
openspec-ff-change
PopularFast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation in one go.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
-
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI.
-
Get the artifact build order
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g.,["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with itsstatusand itsrequiresedges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)planningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
Create every artifact in the required set
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is
ready(dependencies satisfied):- Get instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - The instructions JSON includes:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeskipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifactresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
- Inspect the relevant project before drafting: Read
contextandrulesfirst, then inspect relevant implementation, nearby tests, configuration, and documentation outsideopenspec/. Keep inspection read-only and proportional to the change; reuse findings for later artifacts and inspect more only as needed.- Identify the target project from the request and project context; the planning home may be separate from the code. If the target is unclear, ask. For greenfield or non-code changes, inspect the available structure and relevant documents. If source is unavailable, state the limitation and ask when it materially affects the plan.
- Ground scope, approach, and tasks in what you find. Distinguish observed behavior from assumptions and proposed additions; surface conflicts with existing specs instead of silently deciding which is correct.
- Do this discovery now, rather than leaving generic "explore the codebase" or "make a plan" tasks for implementation. Keep any necessary follow-up investigation specific to an unresolved question.
- If the
instructionfield delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists atresolvedOutputPath - Otherwise create the artifact file using
templateas the structure and write it toresolvedOutputPath. IfresolvedOutputPathis a glob, followinstructionto choose the concrete file path - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "✓ Created <artifact-id>"
b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just
apply.requires)- After creating each artifact, re-run
openspec status --change "<name>" --json - The required set is
applyRequiresplus every artifact reachable from those by following therequiresedges instatus --json- walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone statusis file-existence only, so anapplyRequiresartifact readingdonedoes NOT mean its dependencies exist - writingtasks.mdearly markstasksdone whilespecswas never written. Use each artifact'srequiresedges, not itsstatus, to build the required set: adoneartifact still lists what it depends on- An artifact already reading
status: "skipped"is satisfied: the change declaresskip_specsin.openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
- Skip one only when
statusalready reports itskipped, or when its owninstructionsays it is conditional: runopenspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --jsonand skip only if itsinstructionfield marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven'sdesign.mdqualifies;specsqualifies only via theskippedstatus above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still
blockedonly because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway - Stop when every artifact in the required set is
done,skipped, or was deliberately skipped
c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):
- Ask the user to clarify
- Then continue with creation
- Get instructions:
-
Show final status
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
- Prompt: "Run
/openspec-apply-changeor ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
- Follow the
instructionfield fromopenspec instructionsfor each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names - If the
instructionfield directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use
templateas the structure for your output file - fill in its sections - IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Guardrails
- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in
apply.requires - Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next





