All Skills
12314 skills found
Skills List
create-issue
GitHub Issue を親子構造 (sub-issues) で作成する。`gh issue create` で親・子 Issue を生成し、`gh api .../sub_issues` で親子関係を紐付ける。タイトルは Conventional Commits 形式 (`feat:`, `fix:` 等) を推奨。「Issue 作って」「タスクを分解して Issue 化」などで使用。
fandhe-aiimplement-review
コード変更 (`git diff`) の品質・アーキテクチャ準拠・セキュリティ (OWASP Top 10) を Agent ツール委譲で読み取り専用レビューする。コミット前/PR 作成前のセルフレビュー、「変更をレビューして」「コードレビューして」などで使用。GitHub PR のレビューには implement-review-pr を使用。
fandhe-aiimplement-review-pr
GitHub PR の CI ステータス (`gh pr checks`)・コード品質・セキュリティ (OWASP Top 10)・Conventional Commits 準拠をレビューする。`gh pr review --approve/--request-changes/--comment` でレビュー投稿も可能。「PR #N をレビュー」「PR レビューして」などで使用。ローカル diff のレビューには implement-review を使用。
fandhe-ai
screensdesign-data
Research mobile apps, broader-market competitors, positioning, public App Store reviews, onboarding, paywalls, recorded screens, user flows, App Store creatives, developers, and saved collections through the ScreensDesign MCP. Use when the user asks for mobile product or market research, app ideas, competitor comparisons, revenue/download evidence, review pain points or sentiment, UI references, visual similarity, sequence analysis, or ScreensDesign MCP setup and skill updates.
screensdesign-com
devrel-budget-allocation
Splits a developer relations budget across pillars - events, content, community, tooling, education, OSS sponsorship - into line items that each carry a cash cost, an hours cost, a pre-set return threshold, a review date and a reallocation rule, plus a ranked cut list. Use whenever someone asks how to plan or split a devrel budget, how much to spend on events versus content versus community, whether a line item is worth its money, how to defend a devrel budget at review, or what to cut first when the budget shrinks - even if they only say "we spend too much on conferences". Not the metrics framework (samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-metrics) or one event's ROI (samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-event-sponsorship).
samberdevrel-hiring
Employer-side DevRel hiring - writes the job posting and outcome-based scorecard, designs the interview loop and question bank across the field's formats (presentation round, take-homes, DevRel-opinion round), scores a portfolio against the six-signal rubric, designs a paid work sample instead of unpaid spec work, and builds a 30-60-90 ramp anchored on a friction log. Splits by company type and funding driver. Use when the user asks how to hire a developer advocate, write a DevRel job posting, design a loop for a community manager or educator, evaluate a candidate's portfolio, or plan a ramp. Do NOT use for candidate-side prep (samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-career) or org design (samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-team-structure).
samberdevrel-career
Plans, lands and advances a developer relations career from the candidate side - developer advocate, developer evangelist, DevRel engineer, community manager, developer educator, DX engineer. Covers portfolio audits against real hiring signals, a zero-to-hireable artefact curriculum, the six-rung IC ladder, the interview formats DevRel loops use (talk round, content and coding take-homes, DevRel-opinion round), gatekeeper and pit-trap patterns in postings, and offer evaluation weighing reporting line before pay. Use whenever someone asks how to break into DevRel, prep a developer advocate interview, build a DevRel portfolio, choose a track, plan the next rung, or weigh a DevRel offer - even if they only say "should I take this advocate job". Not a job-search tool.
samberdevrel-strategy
Designs a company's developer relations program from the top - the business driver that funds it, the two goals it is allowed to serve, the pillar mix (advocacy, marketing, enablement, community) for its stage, audience priority, build-vs-buy per bet, staffing sequence, and a written refused list. Use whenever someone asks whether to start doing DevRel, what a new devrel program should do first, why devrel work is busy but not landing, how to justify the program to an exec, which pillar deserves the next investment, who to hire next, or whether to outsource content, events or community - even if they never say "strategy". Not the first-90-days plan - use samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-relations-kickoff. Not metrics, org chart or budget math.
samberdeveloper-quickstart-guide
Writes or audits a developer quickstart that carries a reader from zero to one verified success - minimal path, copy-paste commands, expected output at every step, fail branches, and a cold-run time budget. Use whenever the user mentions a quickstart, a getting-started page, a hello-world doc, "time to first success" or "time to first value", onboarding docs for an API, SDK, CLI or self-hosted tool, or complains nobody finishes their getting-started page - even if they only say "our setup is too hard". Do NOT use for a teaching tutorial (samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-tutorial) or a README rewrite (samber/developer-relations-skills@readme-optimization).
samberdeveloper-community-launch
Decides whether, where and when to launch a developer community, then plans its seeding and first 90 days - venue selection, founding-member seeding, go/no-go criteria, the cheaper no-community alternatives, and shutdown criteria. Use whenever someone asks whether to start a Discord, Slack or forum for their users, which community platform to pick, how to launch or seed a developer community from zero, or how to reach critical mass - even if they only say "we should have a Discord". Do NOT use for a community that already exists; measurement is samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-community-health and moderation is samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-community-moderation.
samberdeveloper-education-strategy
Decides whether and how to invest in structured developer education, such as learning paths, a developer academy, hands-on labs, badges or a full certification program - instead of more ad-hoc content, then designs its operating model, staffing, refresh cadence, measurement and kill rules. Use whenever someone mentions a developer academy, certification, a developer curriculum, training for developers, learning paths, skill badges or credentials, "should we certify our users", partner or SI enablement training, or scaling developer onboarding beyond docs - even if they only say "we need more training content". Covers B2B, partner and bottom-up motions. Never writes the courses themselves. Use samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-tutorial for a lesson.
samberdeveloper-ecosystem-strategy
Decides whether, when and how far a developer product should open into a platform other companies build on - extension points, partner-built integrations, third-party apps, a complement ecosystem - and what that permanently obliges you to. Use whenever someone asks if the product should become a platform, whether to open extension points or an app model to third parties, how to start an integration ecosystem, why nobody builds on the API, whether partners should build the connectors, or how much value complementors must keep - even if they only say "we want an integrations story". Not marketplace operations or API design. Do NOT use for the revenue model - use samber/developer-relations-skills@devtools-business-model.
sambeross-launch
Plans and runs an open-source project launch end to end - name and license clearance, the readiness gate, positioning and one-liner, channel sequencing, the launch-day war room, star-velocity and GitHub Trending mechanics, and post-launch measurement. Use whenever someone is about to release, announce, open-source or "Show HN" a repository, asks how to reach GitHub Trending, wants the first real users or stars for a new library, is planning a Product Hunt post or a multi-day launch week, or asks why a launch fell flat (even if they only say they are pushing a repo public). Covers individual-developer and company adoption. Not ongoing distribution afterwards - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-distribution-strategy instead.
sambeross-distribution-strategy
Designs an open-source project's ongoing distribution mix after the launch window - registry metadata, code-host discovery surfaces, curated lists, downstream packaging, extension and connector marketplaces, the release stream, dependency-graph position, creator seeding, and procurement trust signals - ranked against real maintainer capacity. Use whenever a maintainer asks how people will keep finding the project, which registries or awesome lists to target, why adoption flattened after launch, how often to release for visibility, or how to spend limited maintainer hours on distribution - even if they only say nobody is using it. Not the launch itself - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-launch. Not the build-in-public practice.
samberdevtools-pricing-strategy
Designs the pricing and packaging architecture of a developer tool - the value metric (seats, consumption, capacity, outcome, or a hybrid), free-tier limits, the tier ladder up to enterprise gating, price points bounded by a margin floor and the self-host and build-it ceilings, and a plan to change prices without a backlash. Use whenever someone asks what to charge for a developer tool, how to package tiers, where free ends and paid begins, whether to bill per seat or per usage, how to price against their own open-source edition, or how to raise prices safely - even if they only say the pricing page feels wrong. Not which business model to run - use samber/developer-relations-skills@devtools-business-model. Not pricing-page copy.
samberdeveloper-relations-kickoff
Before starting any developer-relations work - and again at the start of each new session on an existing DevRel project - routes the current task to the right skill of the samber/developer-relations-skills collection, or says plainly that none fits, then bootstraps or resumes the project's shared devrel-context.md artifact. Covers documentation, open source, community, events, technical content, program strategy, devtools business strategy, employer brand and measurement; the output is a routing short-list plus an ordered skill chain. Run it at every project start even when the collection's skills are already in daily use elsewhere, at each periodic DevRel check-in, and whenever routing is unclear - a devrel kickoff, a new developer-relations project, "which devrel skill do I need", devrel, docs or open-source skill routing, or a recurring developer-program review - even if the user only describes a devrel problem and never asks which skill to use.
samberdeveloper-meetup-program
Designs and runs a recurring developer meetup or user group - purpose and host model, format menu, cadence, a standing speaker pipeline, in-kind venue and food sponsors with their conduct limits, no-show planning, the attendee-to-co-organizer ladder, and a health scorecard. Use whenever someone mentions starting a developer meetup or user group, dying meetup attendance, finding meetup speakers, getting a venue or pizza sponsor, how often to meet, RSVPs who never show, or handing the meetup over - even if they only say "we want to do local events". Covers independent, vendor-backed and company-staffed groups. Not for speaking at a conference - use samber/developer-relations-skills@conference-cfp-submission.
sambeross-sponsors-brand-strategy
Builds a company's open-source sponsorship portfolio - which projects and maintainers to fund, through which allocation model, at what amount each, and how to prove it worked. Use whenever a company, OSPO, DevRel lead or engineering leader asks which open-source projects to sponsor, how much to budget for open-source funding, whether sponsoring maintainers is worth it, how to run an employee-nominated FOSS fund, how to fund dependencies at scale, how to pick a sponsorship tier on a maintainer's ladder, or how to measure the return on money paid to maintainers - even if they only say they want to give back. Not the maintainer side of raising sponsorship - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-sponsors-fundraising. Not event sponsorship.
samberdevrel-team-structure
Designs the developer relations org - which function DevRel reports to (marketing, product, engineering, CEO, sales) and what that line starves, the shape (centralized, split, embedded, hub-and-spoke), the coverage map across advocacy, community, docs and education, the interlocks with product, docs, support and sales, and the trigger for the next re-org. Use whenever someone asks where DevRel should sit, who DevRel should report to, how to structure or restructure a devrel team, which devrel roles to staff at this size, whether to embed advocates in product teams, why devrel keeps getting pulled into other teams' work, or how devrel and docs divide ownership - even if they only say the team feels wrong. Not the budget split - use samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-budget-allocation.
sambeross-license-strategy
Chooses an open-source project's license and contribution policy as one decision - permissive vs weak, strong or network copyleft, dependency-driven compatibility constraints, DCO vs CLA vs nothing, dual licensing and open core, source-available options (BUSL, FSL, Elastic License, SSPL), and the fork risk of relicensing. Use whenever someone asks which license to pick, whether MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL or AGPL fits, whether to require a CLA or a DCO sign-off, how to relicense an existing project, whether AGPL really protects against cloud providers, or which LICENSE, SPDX and NOTICE files to ship - even if they only voice a legal worry. Not what the company open-sources at all - use samber/developer-relations-skills@open-source-company-strategy. Never legal advice.
sambeross-contributor-onboarding
Designs and verifies the path a stranger walks to their first merged contribution on an open-source project - the CONTRIBUTING file, the good-first-issue queue, a clone-to-passing-tests command that works cold, and the first-pull-request review and recognition loop, scored against a blocking-plus-weighted rubric. Use whenever someone says "nobody contributes to my project", "write a CONTRIBUTING.md", "our good first issues get no takers", "first-time contributors disappear", "contributor onboarding", "first pull request experience", or "how do we get more open-source contributors" - even if they only complain about a lonely repo. Not triage-system design - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-issue-triage. Not governance or CLA choice.
sambeross-governance
Chooses and documents an open-source project's governance model - decision rights, maintainer roles and promotion, voting and consensus rules, conflict escalation, succession, trademark and asset control, and whether to join a foundation or fiscal host. Use whenever someone asks who decides in their project, wants to write or fix a GOVERNANCE.md, is adding or removing maintainers, worries about bus factor or a single-vendor-controlled project, faces a deadlocked or contested decision, or is preparing a foundation donation - even if they only say the project has no rules. Covers solo, company-backed and multi-vendor projects. Not license, CLA or DCO choice - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-license-strategy. Never legal advice.
samberopen-source-company-strategy
Decides what a company open-sources and what stays proprietary, names the strategic motive for each side of the line, says who owns the decision, and states what the company commits never to close. Use whenever someone asks "should we open source this?", "what should we open source", "where do we draw the open-core line", "which features stay paid", "who signs off on open sourcing this", or wants a company-level open source strategy rather than a plan for one project - even if they frame it as a licensing question. Produces an asset-by-asset open/closed verdict, a value-capture and irreversibility check, a public non-reversal commitment and a re-evaluation trigger. Not license selection - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-license-strategy.
samberopen-standards-strategy
Decides how a company engages a named open standard or protocol - ignore it, consume it, certify conformance, extend it, contribute upstream, co-found a spec with peers, or drive its own as a de facto standard - plus the venue (Git-based spec, foundation, consortium, IETF/W3C/OASIS, ISO transposition), the patent-licensing mode, the conformance plan and the kill rule. Use whenever someone raises open standards participation, protocol strategy, standards body engagement, standards wars, joining versus competing with an emerging protocol, donating a specification to a neutral foundation, whether to standardize an interface at all, or a competitor's rival spec - even if they never say "standard". Not project governance - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-governance.
samber